Discuz! Board

 找回密碼
 立即註冊
搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 2|回復: 0

Comparing DeepSeek and ChatGPT on important criteria

[複製鏈接]

1

主題

1

帖子

5

積分

新手上路

Rank: 1

積分
5
發表於 2025-3-6 14:48:06 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式

Performance and processing speed
DeepSeek and ChatGPT are both powerful AI models, but there is a significant difference in response speed between the two tools. When dealing with complex inference tasks, chatGPT o1 is often faster than Deepseek R1, especially in problems that require multiple logical steps. In real-world ukraine number data testing, chatGPT took just 17 seconds to generate an article about perpetual motion machines, while Deepseek took 26 seconds to complete the task.

gpt chat processing speed is faster than deepseek

Chat GPT processing speed is faster than Deepseek

Additionally, Deepseek sometimes experiences server overload, especially during peak hours, which results in extended response times. In a test of creating a Tetris game using AI, GPT chat completed within 6 seconds, while Deepseek not only took longer but also encountered an overload error, forcing it to rerun multiple times.

Ability to create and customize content
Both of these AI models support users in content creation, summarizing ideas. For GPT chat, it is somewhat superior in creating long, in-depth and creative content more effectively. Especially for blog posts, script writing requests and marketing content. Meanwhile, Deepseek has a short, concise and more technical way of answering.

回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

Archiver|手機版|自動贊助|GameHost抗攻擊論壇

GMT+8, 2025-5-19 23:01 , Processed in 1.357921 second(s), 26 queries .

抗攻擊 by GameHost X3.4

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
一粒米 | 中興米 | 論壇美工 | 設計 抗ddos | 天堂私服 | ddos | ddos | 防ddos | 防禦ddos | 防ddos主機 | 天堂美工 | 設計 防ddos主機 | 抗ddos主機 | 抗ddos | 抗ddos主機 | 抗攻擊論壇 | 天堂自動贊助 | 免費論壇 | 天堂私服 | 天堂123 | 台南清潔 | 天堂 | 天堂私服 | 免費論壇申請 | 抗ddos | 虛擬主機 | 實體主機 | vps | 網域註冊 | 抗攻擊遊戲主機 | ddos |